BY AURELIA MITCHELL DURANT Globalization has become a reality for the planet. The very loose and fluid definition of globalization is summed in an often-quoted quote by former Secretary-General of...
Originally posted 2015-07-09 08:35:03.
Aurelia Mitchell Durant | www.amdlawgroup.com
The AMD LAW Blog has been following the NFL’s Washington Redskins fight to retain the name “Redskins” amid Native American dissent arguing that the name is offensive. However, the Redskins suffered a loss in a recent ruling that threatens to cancel their trademark registration once all federal appeals have been exhausted.
However, the U.S. Supreme Courts ruling in Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. held that a state is entitled to reject content that it deems offensive to the general public; specifically in this instance license plates with the confederate flag were proposed. The publicly displayed nature of license plates was deemed government speech. The Supreme Courts ruling in the Walker case can be viewed as analogous to the issue in the Washington Redskins matter should the name of the football team be considered government speech. Interesting legal banter . . . we will be watching!
AMD LAW Blog Articles can be found at:
Martin, J. and Tatum, S., July 8, 2015, Court Rules Against Redskins Trademark Registration, http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/08/politics/redskins-lose-trademark-battle-in-federal-court/
Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-144_758b.pdf